Palmerston North City Online Portal
City InfoLocal NewsCity MapsDirectoryJobsClassifiedsForumsMovies

Research seeking a scientific foundation for the theory of art appreciation has raised controversies at the intersection of the social and cognitive sciences. Though equally relevant to a scientific inquiry into art appreciation, psychological and historical approaches to art developed independently and lack a common core of theoretical principles. Historicists argue that psychological and brain sciences ignore the fact that artworks are artifacts produced and appreciated in the context of unique historical situations and artistic intentions. After revealing flaws in the psychological approach, we introduce a psycho-historical framework for the science of art appreciation. This framework demonstrates that a science of art appreciation must investigate how appreciators process causal and historical information to classify and explain their psychological responses to art. Expanding on research about the cognition of artifacts, we identify three modes of appreciation: basic exposure to an artwork, the artistic design stance, and artistic understanding. The artistic design stance, a requisite for artistic understanding, is an attitude whereby appreciators develop their sensitivity to art-historical contexts by means of inquiries into the making, authorship, and functions of artworks. We defend and illustrate the psycho-historical framework with an analysis of existing studies on art appreciation in empirical aesthetics. Finally, we argue that the fluency theory of aesthetic pleasure can be amended to meet the requirements of the framework. We conclude that scientists can tackle fundamental questions about the nature and appreciation of art within the psycho-historical framework.Comment inArt appreciation and aesthetic feeling as objects of explanation. [Behav Brain polo Ralph Lauren Factory Store Sci. 2013]Art appreciation and Polo Ralph Lauren Nz aesthetic feeling as objects of explanation.Hogan PC. Behav Brain Sci. 2013 Apr; 36(2):147-8. Causal history, actual and apparent. [Behav Brain Sci. 2013]Causal history, actual and apparent.Levinson J. Behav Brain Sci. 2013 Apr; 36(2):150-1. Mindful art. [Behav Brain Sci. 2013]Mindful art.Malafouris L. Behav Brain Sci. 2013 Apr; 36(2):151-2. Aesthetic meanings and aesthetic emotions: how historical and intentional knowledge expand aesthetic experience. [Behav Brain Sci. 2013]Aesthetic meanings and aesthetic emotions: how historical and intentional knowledge expand aesthetic experience.Silvia PJ. Behav Brain Sci. 2013 Apr; 36(2):157-8. Questioning the necessity of the aesthetic modes. [Behav Brain Sci. 2013]Questioning the necessity of the aesthetic modes.Tullmann K. Behav Brain Sci. 2013 Apr; 36(2):160-1. Psychological and neural responses to art embody viewer and artwork histories. [Behav Brain Sci. 2013]Psychological and neural responses to art embody viewer and artwork histories.Vartanian O, Kaufman JC. Behav Brain Sci. 2013 Apr; 36(2):161-2. The artistic design stance and the interpretation of Paleolithic art. [Behav Brain Sci. 2013]The artistic design stance and the interpretation of Paleolithic art.De Smedt J, De Cruz H. Behav Brain Sci. 2013 Apr; 36(2):139-40. Fechner revisited: towards an inclusive approach to aesthetics. [Behav Brain Sci. 2013]Fechner revisited: towards an inclusive approach to aesthetics.Fitch WT, Westphal-Fitch G. Behav Brain Sci. 2013 Apr; 36(2):140-1. History and essence in human cognition. [Behav Brain Sci. 2013]History and essence in human cognition.Gelman SA, Meyer MA, Noles NS. Behav Brain Sci. 2013 Apr; 36(2):142-3. Artistic understanding as embodied simulation. [Behav Brain Sci. 2013]Artistic understanding as embodied simulation.Gibbs RW Jr. Behav Brain Sci. 2013 Apr; 36(2):143-4. Integrating holism and reductionism in the science of art perception. [Behav Brain Sci. 2013]Integrating holism and reductionism in the science of art perception.Graham DJ. Behav Brain Sci. 2013 Apr; 36(2):145-6. Memories of art. [Behav Brain Sci. 2013]Memories of art.Hirstein W. Behav Brain Sci. 2013 Apr; 36(2):146-7. Extending the psycho-historical framework to understand artistic production. [Behav Brain Sci. 2013]Extending the psycho-historical framework to understand artistic production.Kozbelt A, Ostrofsky J. Behav Brain Sci. 2013 Apr; 36(2):148-9. Acknowledging the diversity of aesthetic experiences: effects of style, meaning, and context. [Behav Brain Sci. 2013]Acknowledging the diversity of aesthetic experiences: effects of style, meaning, and context.Leder H. Behav Brain Sci. 2013 Apr; 36(2):149-50. The duality of art: body and soul. [Behav Brain Sci. 2013]The duality of art: body and soul.Newman GE. Behav Brain Sci. 2013 Apr; 36(2):153. Distinguishing intention and function in art appreciation. [Behav Brain Sci. 2013]Distinguishing intention and function in art appreciation.Parsons G, Carlson A. Behav Brain Sci. 2013 Apr; 36(2):153-4. Exposure, experience, and intention recognition: take it from the bottom. [Behav Brain Sci. 2013]Exposure, experience, and intention recognition: take it from the bottom.Rollins M. Behav Brain Sci. 2013 Apr; 36(2):154-5. Context, causality, and appreciation. [Behav Brain Sci. 2013]Context, causality, and appreciation.Ross S. Behav Brain Sci. 2013 Apr; 36(2):155-6. A bridge too far: from basic exposure to understanding in artistic experience. [Behav Brain Sci. 2013]A bridge too far: polo Ralph Lauren from basic exposure to understanding in artistic experience.Schellekens E. Behav Brain Sci. 2013 Apr; 36(2):156-7. Contextual information processing of brain in art appreciation. [Behav Brain Sci. 2013]Contextual information processing of brain in art appreciation.Takahashi S, Ejima Y. Behav Brain Sci. 2013 Apr; 36(2):158-9. Bridging two worlds that care about art: psychological and historical approaches to art appreciation. [Behav Brain Sci. 2013]Bridging two worlds that care about art: psychological and historical approaches to art appreciation.Thompson WF, Antliff M. Behav Brain Sci. 2013 Apr; polo Ralph Lauren Outlet 36(2):159-60. Extended artistic appreciation. [Behav Brain Sci. 2013]Extended artistic appreciation.Wilson RA. Behav Brain Sci. 2013 Apr; 36(2):162-3. A psycho-historical research program for the integrative science of art. [Behav Brain Sci. 2013]A psycho-historical research program for the integrative science of art.Bullot NJ, Reber R. Behav Brain Sci. 2013 Apr; 36(2):163-80. Artists\' intentions and artwork meanings: some complications. [Behav Brain Sci. 2013]Artists\' intentions and artwork meanings: some complications.Davies S. Behav Brain Sci. 2013 Apr; 36(2):138-9. \"The anti-developmental, the anti-narrative, the anti-historical\": Mondrian as a paradigmatic artist for empirical aesthetics. [Behav Brain Sci. 2013]\"The anti-developmental, the anti-narrative, the anti-historical\": Mondrian as a paradigmatic artist for empirical aesthetics.McManus C. Behav Brain Sci. 2013 Apr; 36(2):152-3. Neuroaesthetics: range and restrictions. [Behav Brain Sci. 2013]Neuroaesthetics: range and restrictions.Chatterjee A. Behav Brain Sci. 2013 Apr; 36(2):137-8. Educating the design stance: issues of coherence and transgression. [Behav Brain Sci. 2013]Educating the design stance: issues of coherence and transgression.Freeman NH, Allen ML. Behav Brain Sci. 2013 Apr; 36(2):141-2. Normative and scientific approaches to the understanding and evaluation of art. [Behav Brain Sci. 2013]Normative and scientific approaches to the understanding and evaluation of art.Gilmore J. Behav Brain Sci. 2013 Apr; 36(2):144-5.


[ Contact Us | Member Login ]